Big Carpet (Signature Style)
- Width: 95 cm
- Length: 145 cm
ID: 7170462083# Big Carpet (Signature Style) !(https://denigma.io/media/jpg/3821c52c53de18ba3a529eee7970f7a0.jpg) Dimensions: * Width: 95 cm * Length: 145 cm Category: furniture Condition: excellent Delivery possible! ID: 7170462083
This is a very solid wood/metal corner computer desk with keyboard holder and monitor/screen stand. It can simply be taken apart for easy transportation and put together again without hassles. It is very solid, makes effective use of corner space and suitable for all kind of ...
# Corner Computer Desk This is a very solid wood/metal corner computer desk with keyboard holder and monitor/screen stand. It can simply be taken apart for easy transportation and put together again without hassles. It is very solid, makes effective use of corner space and suitable for all kind of experiments. !(https://denigma.io/media/jpg/2e2a4e80e568638082e767294ecc3c69.jpg) !(https://denigma.io/media/jpg/c8a5ca2c47f59491d7bb162f61b7505e.jpg) !(https://denigma.io/media/jpg/caadb6818d192f205b641dc5632316db.jpg) !(https://denigma.io/media/jpg/df043bb39d388f4465a55ff1f373b37e.jpg) Category: furniture Condition: fair Availability: 4 Delivery possible! ID: 7170459840
This glass and metal extendable coffee table has two parts (a cubic and a rectangular shape component) that can be slide into each other.
Cube Dimensions: 50 x 50 x 50 cm; Weight: 4.3 kg
Rectangle Dimensions: 45 x 90 x 45 cm; Weight: 10.1 kg
# Two Part Glass Coffee Table with Metal Frame This glass and metal extendable coffee table has two parts (a cubic and a rectangular shape component) that can be slide into each other. Cube Dimensions: 50 x 50 x 50 cm; Weight: 4.3 kg Rectangle Dimensions: 45 x 90 x 45 cm; Weight: 10.1 kg !(https://denigma.io/media/jpg/270ed24f65179d727be3e96907348786.jpg) !(https://denigma.io/media/jpg/b2107a0e7d84d3cb032c31d9dfd6c192.jpg) !(https://denigma.io/media/jpg/366dfae2540bac6876d4080d0d0f65f4.jpg) Category: furniture Size: 50 x 92 x 50 cm Condition: good Delivery possible! ID: 7170459405
A loyal friend that’s been in our range since 1979. With tender loving care we’ve made it even better. It’s easy to assemble, lift and move around. We’ve kept the prices down, so your spirits rise.
!(ht...# LACK Side Table A loyal friend that’s been in our range since 1979. With tender loving care we’ve made it even better. It’s easy to assemble, lift and move around. We’ve kept the prices down, so your spirits rise. !(https://denigma.io/media/jpg/bf79e201770581fa518a137cfac2f754.jpg) !(https://denigma.io/media/jpg/f2628165dd31a90e949a4aead1a2993b.jpg) Dimensions: * Length: 55 cm * Width: 55 cm * Height: 45 cm Weight: 4 kg Delivery possible! Category: furniture Condition: excellent Sold out.
This blue/white convertible high chair has the following features:
# Evenflo 4-in-1 Eat and Grow Convertible High Chair for Toddlers This blue/white convertible high chair has the following features: * Convertible high chair accompanies your kid’s changing needs throughout their early years * 5-point safety harness keeps them securely in the seat * One-hand tray removal aids in quick setup and disassembly !(https://denigma.io/media/jpg/9f80437582bcd8f891b3d20042df1a00.jpg) !(https://denigma.io/media/jpg/ef8b38bcc838922ab05bdb4238d9d53c.jpg) !(https://denigma.io/media/jpg/95da91c04f4a2c4c99351fc791f0ac61.jpg) Category: baby & kid stuff Condition: excellent Delivery possible! ID: 7170458684
Coverall Face Shields are designed for total facial splash protection.
# Coverall Full Face Shields ## Barriers for Diseases Coverall Face Shields are designed for total facial splash protection. * The face shield's wrap-around design provides the wearer with great peripheral vision while acting as a protective shield against non-hazardous liquid splash and light particles in a Lab or Controlled Environment * The Coverall face shield is not ANSI Z87 rated for eye protection * 0.7 mil shield is very lightweight and can be worn comfortably for long periods * Fits easily over prescription glasses or protective eye-wear * Double sided anti-fog treatment virtually eliminates fogging * Non-distorting, transparent shield; excellent peripheral vision and protection * Latex free elastic foam headband fits snugly against the forehead comfortably * Country of Origin: United States of America !(https://denigma.io/media/jpg/028c7565e5e15f11b4292a7a358a602b.jpg) !(https://denigma.io/media/jpg/18684c064472e4b221c1391c98d48f91.jpg) !(https://denigma.io/media/jpg/01ee24b3d365db79109a41922407db11.jpg) !(https://denigma.io/media/jpg/399e304d3b3304f39ba3da6e1faa2b9d.jpg) !(https://denigma.io/media/jpg/468ec51b7161875f985ac014cf5b56d7.jpg) Availability: 11 Delivery possible! Category: business/commercial Condition: new ID: 7170458309
The stand allows to vary the height. It is foldable for easy transportation. The great thing about this board is that it can be positioned every where.
Dimensions (without the stand):
...# Very Handy White Board with Stand The stand allows to vary the height. It is foldable for easy transportation. The great thing about this board is that it can be positioned every where. !(https://denigma.io/media/jpg/9b755c718472a338ee97fcda02614cf8.jpg) Dimensions (without the stand): * Height: 90 cm * Width: 60 cm * Length: 1 cm Category: business/commercial Condition: like new ID: 7170457760
Comes with a hanger at the back. Can be hang at a wall.
Category: arts & crafts
ID: 7170456844# Fruit Plate Art for the Wall Comes with a hanger at the back. Can be hang at a wall. !(https://denigma.io/media/jpg/ff25619a6f1ee4e4596bd1d56d195e43.jpg) Category: arts & crafts Condition: new ID: 7170456844
This white turn-N-tube 4-tier multipurpose shelf display rack is very handy to put things in place for easy reach. It is modular and can be composed into individual units to have for instance two 2-units or 1 as well as 3 unit or 4 times si...
# White Turn-N-Tube 4-Tier Multipurpose Shelf Display Rack This white turn-N-tube 4-tier multipurpose shelf display rack is very handy to put things in place for easy reach. It is modular and can be composed into individual units to have for instance two 2-units or 1 as well as 3 unit or 4 times single shelves. !(https://denigma.io/media/jpg/8b131dc0df978d0147e4c5d8a7a68fc9.jpg) !(https://denigma.io/media/jpg/0f493cb0466fb40537943f019dfe3d85.jpg) Dimensions: * Height: 47 3/8 inches (120.3 cm) * Width: 14 1/8 inches (35.9 cm) * Depth: 21 3/4 inches (55.2 cm) Delivery possible! Category: furniture Condition: like new ID: 7170455912
---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Cia Fbi email@example.com Date: Thu, May 28, 2020 at 2:03 PM Subject: Fwd: Information related to my asylum case To: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
I want to come to be listened to but I can no longer afford it. But since ever...---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Cia Fbi <firstname.lastname@example.org> Date: Thu, May 28, 2020 at 2:03 PM Subject: Fwd: Information related to my asylum case To: <email@example.com>, <firstname.lastname@example.org> I want to come to be listened to but I can no longer afford it. But since everything must eventually become relative and subjective because if enough contradicting and mutually exclusive perspectives are considered simultaneously nothing can ever be objective and absolute. Even when I was deported from Cuba on 12/9/19, I was told not to take it personally because I am welcome to return since everything is possible in Cuba but only for cash. They offered me to listen to me for $3/hour if I'd bring back my cash from America But now I must seek listening time alternatives despite being broke That is why listening volunteers are so much better than licensed therapists because they actually listen regardless of my ability to pay. Actually my BCBS of Arkansas health insurance covers therapy sessions via Skype. But when I tried it in Little Rock, AR, the Skype therapist was trying to trick me into paying her an extra $50 for each session even though my health insurance told me that this is illegal. This caused me to fear therapists. But at the time I had the hope to get hired and become independent. But now my situation is much more serious because I must admit my depression is adversely affecting my chances to escape from it. Below is about 1% of my financial. economic, suicide and other secrets, which keep getting denied and ignored instead of getting explored It feels very strange when our obsolete concepts of true or false, right or wrong, better or worse have failed to such an extend that I can no longer discern between them. But even if there were an absolute truth our human perspectives are too subjective to distinguish it from its false alternatives. For example, there must be an absolute truth about how Hillary Clinton's emails got exposed to Wikileaks But even if a KGB officer would confess how he achieved this, he could be lying to deceptively disguise the true truth. But since we cannot trust enough to distinguish between the absolute truth about chains of events from our recent past and their alternative explanations by deceptive roomers, the absolute truth no longer matters as long as it seems to only depend on inherently subjective bias memories in the absence of independently reproducible evidence. But despite providing independently reproducible evidence for misdiagnosis, health insurance fraud, discrimination, etc., nobody is willing to take the time to independently reproduce the chain of events that have adversely affected me since August of 1993 until now. This prevents me from figuring out remedies to overcome such kind of challenges in the future as long as the past remains to be ignored. How should I cope? Thanks, Thomas Hahn, PhDAndroid Smartphone: + 1 571 839 0727Google Voice Phone: + 1 501 301 4890Skype: TFH002Email: CIA101FBI@gmail.com ======================================================================== ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Cia Fbi <email@example.com> Date: Thu, May 28, 2020 at 10:33 AM Subject: Information related to my asylum case To: <firstname.lastname@example.org> Dear Niko, Thanks a lot for calling me this morning. Since it must be challenging to comprehend the motivation behind my asylum application please ignore those parts you cannot agree with. My alien registration number is A 216 640 890. How can I find all the American law schools that operate legal immigration clinics? Here are the once I contacted today but there should be many more 1.) Georgetown University Law Clinic https://www.law.georgetown.edu/ (202) 662-9000 - work5/26/20 1:01 PM 3 hours ago 1 minute long 2.) Legal Clinic of George Washington University press option 4 https://www.law.gwu.edu (202) 994-1010 - mobile5/26/20 1:15 PM 3 hours ago 2 minutes long 3.) Legal clinic at https://www.wcl.american.edu/academics/experientialedu/clinical/ (202) 274-4000 - mobile5/26/20 1:30 PM 3 hours ago 5 minutes long How can I find more of them to ask to be placed on their waiting list? ================================================================== Below I have described the legal conundrum, which I am trapped in, explaining why nobody wants to take my case. How can I get the help I need to find somebody, who is willing to take my case? ================================================================ How flexible is the definition of political asylum? Could psychiatric imprisonment due to misdiagnosed mental illness be a reason to apply for political asylum? In Germany everyone believes that I must get permanently committed into a mental hospital because they are refusing to try to understand me. I have been misdiagnosed with almost every mental illness because mental healthcare professionals pretend that my logic is irrational. If I would ever get deported back to Germany, somebody else would get legal guardianship over me. This will cause the loss of my independence, autonomy and motivation to live. Therefore, if I will ever get forced to set foot on German grounds, I will buy to packages of Paracetamol. No prescription is needed to buy these headache pills in Germany. My brother, the psychiatrist Dr. Eric Hahn told me that if I take 40 pills of Paracetamol all at once, I'd definitely die because they overwhelm the detoxification capabilities of the human liver. Ever since I graduated from Holdingford Public Area High School www.isd738.org in Holdingford MN on May 31st 1993, I have been exposed to psychological warfare in Germany by being falsely accused of mental illnesses I never had simply to discredit me. In spring of 1994, I was intentionally misdiagnosed by Hochschwarzwaldklinik (psychiatric clinic in St. Blasien, Germany and many other mental hospitals as being incapable to benefit from any kind of education and therapy. Therefore, I returned to America to earn 2 BS, 2 MS and 1 PhD in the USA. Please see attached CV to prove the German Mental Healthcare System wrong. But until I succeeded to escape back into the USA, Germany was the worst suicide triggering invisible mental prison I was trapped in without any chance to complain about it Forced psychiatric mental hospital imprisonment is much worse than political imprisonment because mental healthcare professionals intentionally disappoint and discredit me to drive me into committing suicide because I know too much that would cause serious problems for mental healthcare professionals if it ever got known. Only by locking me up in a mental hospitals based on intentional mental misdiagnoses they can discredit me to protect themselves. They intentionally isolate me by disappointing me until I feel suicidal enough to lock me up. They intentionally deprive me of all acceptable suicide alternatives until suicide remains the only option to accuse me of suffering from serious mental illnesses until even I start believing it despite knowing better. Stanford University in Palo Alto, CA, USA has ruled out that I suffer from any mental illness in November of 2018. My psychiatric treatment team at Stanford referred to my situation as disheartening because I can understand the reasons why everything keeps going wrong without being able to intervene because nobody is taking me serious anymore and believes me anything I say or write. I am visually impaired due to Albinism, autistic and have ADHD. That is why I cannot understand what I am reading unless I take Adderall. But this medication is not available in Germany. Nobody in Germany wants to take the risk to sympathize with me because this would imply to oppose everyone else. I suffer from a much more serious medical condition than bipolar disorder, which causes me to sweat a lot and deprives my body of the energy it needs to keep functioning, but it lacks a medical diagnostic code. Hence, it cannot be treated in Germany because there our national health insurance system limits the options of the physicians My medical records from the ER of Baptist Hospital (https://www.baptist-health.com/location/baptist-health-medical-center-little-rock/) in Little Rock, AR, USA from 6/4/17 prove this but nobody is taking them seriously. At 9.25 a.m. CST on 6/4/17, I was supposed to depart with Delta Airlines from Little Rock, AR to Philadelphia, PA to participate in SAP's Autism at Work program with the hope get hired by SAP. Unfortunately, I suffered from a near death experience lacking the strength to move and breathe. Hence, I had to pay my taxi driver $200 to pack my suitcase and drive me to the airport. When I sat down in my airplane seat at 9 a.m. on 6/4/17 Delta Airline refused to fly me for medical reasons despite me trying to deny them because I looked to sick for them. That is why Delta Airlines called the Ambulance and refused to fly me unless I could show them a letter from a doctor that it is medically safe for me to fly. All the medical test results at the Baptist Hospital ER in Little Rock came back as normal in the afternoon of 6/4/17. Hence, the ER doctor gave me the letter Delta Airline demanded that it is medically safe for me to fly. I landed in Philadelphia shortly after midnight. Only one doctor believes me that I seriously lack energy. He practices here in Lake Charles at https://www.lcmh.com In Germany nobody believes me anything. In America medical doctors are more independent than in Germany and can choose to treat their patients until they start feeling better. This is impossible in Germany because there the nationalized healthcare system severely limits the medical treatment options. A German doctor faces the risk to loose his license if the health insurance determines that he/she prescribes too much expensive medications. No German doctor would take the time to even look at my American medical records. In Germany I would get committed into a mental hospital for being too bipolar to drive, suicidal, insane, delusional, manic, crazy, etc. without any chance to defend myself because everyone would discredit me. They would force on me the medical treatment that hurts me the most and deprive me of the medical treatment that would benefit me the most until I kill myself if I could. They would misdiagnose me with life-threatening bipolar disorder. During the day they'd lock the door to my bedroom. This requires me to lay on the floor of the day room if I lack the energy to sit as I am supposed to. Even the Cuban Immigration Services built me a bed at the airport in Havana while I was awaiting deportation back to Cancun, Mexico departing from Havana at 5 p.m. on 12/8/19. German patients misdiagnosed with mental illnesses are universally discredited especially when they need ADHD stimulants that is only available in the USA, but forbidden in Germany. The worst problem is that my brother Dr. Eric Hahn is a psychiatrist in Germany. He does not want to be associated with me because he fears that this could adversely affect his medical career. That is why I could not get any Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) treatment when I was trapped in Germany in 2015/16. The logical reasoning in my asylum application is the opposite of what everyone would expect, but nevertheless it is absolutely true, no matter how many people will try to deny and ignore it. But how can I convey this to a federal immigration judge to convince him/her of the necessity to grant me asylum in the USA because invisible, imperceptible, medical and mental imprisonment is much more suicide triggering than political imprisonment. Political prisoners are not discredited like mental and medical prisoners. Medical and mental misdiagnoses have happened to me in America too, but unlike in Germany, here I can much better cope with it, because I have bad health insurance. After 20 days, my American health insurance stops paying for mental hospitalizations. This is the only way for me to get my freedom back. In Germany this would never happen because my health insurance is required to pay indefinitely. Even in America I was committed to mental hospitals more than 30 times for feeling suicidal but it only got worse every time. But a single night in the detention facility at the Dullas International Airport cured me from feeling suicidal because there they took my German passport away. Fortunately, without a German passport nobody can trick me to return to Germany. Before I spent the night from 2/6/20 to 2/7/20 at the detention facility at the Dullas International Airport even I could not imagine that my own German passport is a removable suicide trigger. I was paroled into the USA on 2/7/20 from the Dullas International Airport detention center without my German passport. I have attached the immigration documents that were given to me because I my eyesight is too poor to actually read them? Am I permitted to work legally in the USA under my old SSN when I was still on F-1 visa? What is my immigration status? Unfortunately, I was committed to Dominian Mental Hospital https://dominionhospital.com/ in Falls Church, VA on 2/13/20 because I could not defend myself against being falsely accused of being delusional and manic but no longer suicidal. I lost both of my court hearings at the courthouse in Manasas, VA (https://www.manassascity.org/) on 2/17/20 and 3/4/20 (http://www.courts.state.va.us/courts/circuit/prince_william/home.html). Circuit judge Hudson ruled on 3/4/20 that I am too mentally ill to ride the Greyhound bus and that therefore, the least restrictive environment is the locked adult psych ward for adults on the second floor of the Dominan Hospital in Falls Church, VA (https://dominionhospital.com/). Nobody paid attention to the fact that I never had any problems riding the Greyhound bus since 1992. My witnesses are my attorney Curt Nichols ( email@example.com ) and Deputy Sean Whitmore (SWhitmore@pwcgov.org ), whom I have cc-ed in this email. Fortunately, my health insurance refused to pay beyond 3/4/20 to stay at the acute adult psych ward at Dominian Hospital ( https://dominionhospital.com) Hence, I was transferred to the Northern Virginia Mental Health Institute (NVMHI) ( https://www.nvmhi.dbhds.virginia.gov) in the afternoon of 3/4/20. At the Northern Virginia Mental Health Institute (NVMHI) ( https://www.nvmhi.dbhds.virginia.gov) they realized quickly that there was nothing wrong with me mentally. Hence, the Northern Virginia Mental Health Institute (NVMHI) ( https://www.nvmhi.dbhds.virginia.gov) paid for my Greyhound bus ticket departing from Springfield, VA at 6.30 a.m. on 3/7/20 and arriving at South Hill, VA at 1.30 p.m. This proves that there was nothing wrong with me to begin with. Therefore, the risk that there is nothing wrong with the criminal, but with the law instead, can no longer be responsibly neglected. The true problem is that mental hospitals commit health insurance fraud of misdiagnosed patients like me, who cannot defend themselves, because nobody is taking them serious. This is probably forbidden to say but it is true nevertheless. In America, I can get away with telling the truth, but in Germany I cannot. Hence, I feel that the court records of my lost court hearings are essential to argue my asylum case in front of a federal judge. Unfortunately, I have not been able to find an immigration lawyer, who supports me in telling the truth because I am uncertain whether this is allowed. My true reason to apply for asylum in the USA is this: It has been establish that no legal system of any country can protect me from mental misdiagnoses. Fortunately, poor health insurance coverage in the USA benefits me because it causes mental hospitals to discharge me eventually. Indefinite health insurance coverage in Germany drives me into committing suicide because I'd rather be dead than discredited for the rest of my life. America is much more diverse than Germany. Hence, I have much better chances in the USA to find friends with whom I can stay, who take me serious regardless of the opinions of others and to whom my life is more important than any rules, regulations, laws, procedures, etc. and medical doctors, who take me at least as serious as themselves. One of the most fundamental flaws everyone keeps ignoring that adhering to rules, regulations, laws and procedures is more important to most people than to accomplish the goals and objectives they were initially designed to achieve. What keeps happening to me is much worse than political prosecution because it is almost impossible to complain about it. Judges seem to have the limitation that they will only approve what they can understand. But why can a judge deprive me of the option to ride the Greyhound bus simply because he cannot understand I can do it? Louisiana Association for the Blind (www.lablind.com) and Louisiana Rehabilitation Services (LRS) ( www.laworks.net/WorkforceDev/LRS/LRS_RegionalOffices.asp) have wrongly accused me to be too bipolar to drive to falsely determine that I am unemployable to close my vocational rehabilitation case. Now they refuse to communicate with me regarding reopening my vocational rehabilitation case in Lake Charles, LA. Nobody seems to care about the medical malpractice and HIPPA law violations committed by LAB (www.lablind.com) and LRS (http://www.laworks.net/WorkforceDev/LRS/LRS_Main.asp). And I was so stupid to believe these false lies and flew all the way to Havana to get a second medical opinion on my bipolar misdiagnosis because I'd much rather be dead than to be too bipolar to drive, which is an oxymoron in itself. Jorge ( firstname.lastname@example.org ), the airport supervisor from Havana is my witness that I was trying to seek medical help in Havana on 12/8/19 and 12/9/19 to prove LAB's (www.lablind.com) and LRS ( www.laworks.net/WorkforceDev/LRS/LRS_Main.asp) confusing medical malpractice suicide triggering lies wrong. www.ualr.edu and www.uams.edu have falsely suspended me for a year from my Bioinformatics PhD program in 2015 as an unfair punishment for submitting my research to present at the AHEAD https://www.ahead.org conference in the Twin Cites held during the summer of 2015 because it is a violation of my student rights according to the UALR student handbook but nobody ever cared. www.ualr.edu keeps discriminating against me by denying me access to my emails at TFHahn@UALR.edu. I urgently need to check for job offers at my TFHahn@UALR.edu email account. All these violations above should have never happened in the first place. That is why there seems to be no remedy for them. But denying and ignoring them is even worse because others face the same suicide triggering discrimination risk as I am. From all the agencies, facilities and organizations I interacted with ever since I started my post secondary education in America on 8/24/01, the detention facility at the Dullas International Airport was the most respectful, understanding, encouraging, healing and life-saving because my life was more important for them than to enforce their own laws. Why can't other agencies, entities organizations, etc. follow the leading example of the detention facility at the Dullas International Airport? It cannot be too hard to understand me because if they can if they only try, then everyone else can, except when pretending that they cannot. I urgently need a work permit for the USA because then all the discrimination can no longer hurt me. An American federal worker committed suicide because he was fired when a new administration took office. He had no history of mental illness. Hence, the law was changed to protect federal workers from committing suicide by making it illegal for new incoming administration to fire them. But why do people need to die before the laws are changed to protect their lives in the future? I am totally broke. I must be allowed to stand on my own feet. But how can this be explained to a federal immigration judge in a way that he/she be inclined grant me asylum, work permit and independence? The law areas in which I need help might be immigration law, medical malpractice, discrimination, misdiagnosis, HIPPA law violation, authorities overstepping boundaries, discrediting lies, having the impression to get driven into committing suicide by ignorance and pretending not to understand. I no longer know what else to do and how to defend myself. I would like to get understood because I feel that is most important for staying alive. Thanks a lot in advance for your response. Very sincerely, Thomas Hahn, PhD Email: CIA101FBI@gmail.com Google Voice Phone: + 1 (501) 301 4890 Android Smartphone: + 1 (571) 839 0727 Skype ID: TFH002 ============================================== Yesterday, I was told that I would not qualify for asylum because it is only given to individuals, who can prove that they have prosecuted because of their nationality, citizenship, religion, political opinion or membership in a social group unless mentally misdiagnosed patients are considered as a social opinion. However, I remember reading about a German grandfather, who was an American citizen at the time he took his grandson from Germany while he still was a little baby to America and raised him here because his parents could not take care of him in Germany. But when he flew his grandson from Germany to the USA nobody could suspect that this was a permanent solution. The baby grandson must have entered America initially on a tourist visa. Since the grandfather was not aware of US immigration laws, his grandson overstayed his visa but nothing happened until his grandson tried to apply for financial aid to help pay for his post secondary education in the USA. During his senior year in high school the grandson himself discovered that he was illegal. Hence, he was supposed to get deported. But a federal immigration judge stopped it arguing that Germany was a foreign country for him because he could not even understand German. By that time his grandfather suffered from severe dementia. If we could find this ruling, maybe an immigration lawyer would be willing to represent me because in a way I am facing the same problem. I have been living in America since 2001. This caused me to think so differently that nobody in Germany can understand me anymore. The big risk I am concerned about is that our obsession to follow our laws is more important to us than accomplishing the goals for which the laws were initially passed to achieve. Like me, all people are driven in their decision making process by their past experiences and information available to them at the time they must make decisions. As long as I had my OPT work permit and enough money, I was not driven to try to work illegally. But after I lost it, because LAB (www.lablind.com) and LRS (http://www.laworks.net/WorkforceDev/LRS/LRS_Main.asp) discriminated against me by accusing me to be unemployable because I am supposedly too bipolar to drive, I quickly learned that I can work illegally while hidden under somebody else's SSN as a freelancer at www.guru.com, www.upwork.com, freelancer.com, etc. As soon as I figured this out, I realized that this is common practice among F-1 visa holders. While I was stranded in Mexico for 2 months, I realized that this option remains available worldwide without needing to be present in the USA. But since the income tax only 16% in Mexico, American freelancers would have an incentive to have their freelancing income taxed in Mexico rather than in the USA. Later I learned that Oman does not have any income tax. When Bank of America told me that they intentionally chose not to have branches in the states of LA, GA, AL to avoid the risk to get in trouble with antitrust laws, I realized that dictatorships can easily circumvent this problem by secretly manipulating multiple competitors simultaneously to force them to compete harder against each other than they can under the laws of our standard market economic conditions. Punishing with economic sanctions will only be a stronger intensive to set up freelancing websites here, which are secretly operated by foreign secret services, because its return on investment is much higher than any kind of military spending. This is so simple to figure out that I cannot understand why it is not already happening. While I was deported from Cuba on 12/9/19, at least the Havana airport supervisor understood this, or else, I would not have applied for asylum there. But Cuban Immigration Services did not seem to believe him. But since everything remains irrelevant as long as people keep pretending not to understand this, I cannot figure out under what category my situation would fit. The main reason why I could not publish about this, is because I could not find an audience interested in learning about it. Hence, if I cannot get my work permit, asylum, etc. approved, I have no other option than trying it. But once I did, I can no longer talk about it. Therefore, there is a risk that nobody is aware that others have tried it before me. I have so many cool business ideas that I can only try after I have been granted American citizenship because otherwise I cannot qualify for https://www.sbir.gov/ startup funding. Currently, my favorite https://www.sbir.gov/ grant proposal is a Fraud Protection Protection Insurance (FPPI) that bank customers can buy for lets say $100/month. If any of the insured FPPI clients must authenticate himself at the closest financial center, FPPI will pay up to $10,000 to fly him back to his closest financial center. This happened to my while I was stranded for 2 months in Mexico. I was worried that this might happen because my computer is infected with a virus that tries to steal money from Bank of America but nobody takes me serious. That is why I cannot get my online banking approved. If my asylum application fails we need to try EB2 NIW. Below are links to complains I filed but that nobody seems to take serious. https://ocrcas.ed.gov/office-for-civil-rights-discrimination-complaint-form/done?sid=450238&token=780e3472c8eeae9d457079a59c3156e5 https://ocrcas.ed.gov/office-for-civil-rights-discrimination-complaint-form/done?sid=450237&token=d75dc93af37033f5992fbfcfcdcebbb8 Below is what we could do if I would be listened to. ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Thomas Hahn <email@example.com> Date: Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 1:33 PM Subject: Regarding trying to understand what I want t be done To: <firstname.lastname@example.org> Dear JimDoyle, Thankyou very much for your time to listen to me today. Honestly,I am not yet sure what I would like to be done, because I feel that I cannotrealistically predict the available options. =========================================== Ideally, I would still like to become gainfully employed despite being visually impairedto do Albinism, dyslexic, autistic ADHD and loss of my OPT work permit. ============================================== Althoughthis seems to be impossible now until any of my other pending or intended workpermit applications have been officially approved, I would like somebody otherthan me to fully understand all the reasons, which have contributed to thismost frustrating situation - while everything is still fresh in my mind -without blaming anybody, because only then we have the best chances tosignificantly lower the risk for this to happen again to others in the future. I amvery confident that so much can be learned from my experience and theirinsights that much more than the already lost $500,000 can easily be recoveredwhile achieving a much better outcomes in less than a year, not only in thefield of 1.)Vocational Rehabilitation, but alsoin other related areas, including, but not limited to 2.)Employment, 3.)Healthcare,4.)Education, 5.)Research, 6.)Immigration, 7.) Thelegal system,8.) Theprison system,9.) Lawenforcement,10.)Crime prevention,11.)Judiciary System,12.)Providing much better feedback options, 13.)Human interactions, 14.)Individual Independence,15.)Economic Competitiveness, 16.)Human decision making,17.)Global Political Influence,18.)Behavioral Modifications and Adoptions, 19.)Predictability of future human behaviors,20.)Leadership etc. ============================================= I amworried about that - if too much time elapses to cause my most recent memoriesto fade - then our chances to succeed in this as a nation, society andcivilizations will decline. Pleaseadvise me how to you would recommend me to proceed regarding this and get backto me at your earliest convenience. I can bereached at. Email: Hahn5Thomas@gmail.comSmartPhone: + 1 (501) 303 6595GoogleVoice Phone: + (501) 301-4890SkypeUser ID: TFH002. Very sincerely, ThomasHahn, PhD ============================================Draft tobe emailed to email@example.com ===================================== The email below proves that the government wants me to get a work permit but there is nothing it can do. ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Doyle, Jim <Jim.Doyle@ed.gov> Date: Wed, May 6, 2020 at 11:38 AM Subject: RE: Message To: Thomas Hahn <firstname.lastname@example.org> Mr. Hanh, I agree with you that you need a work permit to pursue employment and possibly vocational rehabilitation (VR) services. You indicated that you are not aware of your immigration status and stated that you were paroled to the US on 2/6/2020. I understand you were out of the country for several months before this time. Are you in the country until your immigration hearing? If so, what is your date for the hearing or any next step? If not, can you clarify how you got back in the country? Are you working with an immigration attorney now? I saw prior correspondences with an immigration attorney, I believe in AR. Are you still in contact with this attorney, and if not, did you try to reach out to any of the other immigration specialist or attorneys recently? In addition, please clarify why you will not work with any mental health official in your area? It’s obvious you’ve been through a lot and I believe it would help you to see someone to further assist you. Thank you Jim DoyleProgram SpecialistRehabilitation Services AdministrationU.S. Dept. Of Education550 12th St, SW, Rm 5125Washington, DC 20202202-245-6630Jim.Doyle@ed.gov From: Thomas Hahn <email@example.com> Sent: Monday, May 4, 2020 3:35 PM To: Doyle, Jim <Jim.Doyle@ed.gov> Subject: Re: Message Dear Jim Thanks for replying. Can we talk on the phone? I am in Louisiana. I urgently need a work permit. If I can get work permit, then all the other more fundamental problems do not need to be solved immediately. I need help to explain this to a federal immigration judge. I urgently need to be understood because everything is so different than what others can imagine. I want to explain this before I die but nobody has time to listen. Trying to explain in writing is not helping because nobody has time to read and understand. I could start working illegally. I figured it out. I am trying not to break the law. I must get listen to soon or else bad things can happen if I do not commit suicide. I could start help building undetectable economic monopolies. I could make a suicide virus. I could give away the secret of Aurora, CO. I could start an anarchy revolution. The problem is that nobody understands the danger of ignorance. I never felt so alone. It cannot stay like that unless I get killed. I need to talk to somebody, who can listen,understand and help to get problems solved. I am afraid to lose my mind. Even though I know what is wrong, it cannot help, unless somebody else understands it as well. My suicide hotline has started to ignore me. That is why I want to commit suicide now. But this is not caused by a mental illness. A federal worker committed suicide because he got fired when a new administration took office. Hence, the law was changed to prohibit the firing of federal workers by new administrations. He had no mental illness. I can prove that we have no choice. We function like honeybee insects but our society does not reflect this. The main problem is that rules are more important than the goal for which they were developed to achieve. If I kill myself now, it will take many years until somebody else can rediscover this. Soon I will no longer be able to explain this. I need listening time because I am a talk thinker. I need somebody to talk to in order to solve my own problems. If I cannot get this kind of understanding, I cannot stay alive. Mental healthcare professionals will make this problem only worse. My reading speed is too slow to figure out where I can seek help. What has happened to me happened to others too but nobody is aware of it. That is why I am trying to explain this but I cannot figure out to whom. Something is about to go terribly wrong and turn very evil. I am still trying to avoid it but I cannot figure out how. Since my motivation to keep solving problems is completely destroyed, suicide is the only alternative. I was paroled into the USA on 2/6/20. That saved my life. That is why I do not want to hurt America but it can happen because humans have no choice. I am not sure what my immigration status is. I need help with my asylum application. I may kill myself because my way of thinking does not seem to make sense to anybody. I don't know how else to explain it. The problem is not that people cannot understand me, but that they pretend not to understand me. If this is true, then such kind of problems cannot be solved. Then suicide or retaliation are the only alternative responses. I do not like either one of them. My phone numbers are 1.) + 1 (501) 301 48902.) + 1 (571) 839 0727 On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 1:52 PM Doyle, Jim <Jim.Doyle@ed.gov> wrote:Hi Thomas, I am very sorry to hear about your struggles and understand you are feeling very frustrated. I’m trying to understand your current situation and how I may be able to help, if possible. Please provide me the following information: What State and city are you located?What is your current status (i.e. do you have temporary status to work)?Are you receiving any counseling from a mental health provider or receiving any other assistance at this time? Are you taking any medication? What assistance are you specifically seeking at this time? Regarding the last question, I understand your frustrated with much of what occurred before, but I would rather you focus on what we need to do now to get going in the right direction. Please don’t provide me information about concerns you have regarding to your past experiences, rather let’s focus on what needs to be done now. Thank you Jim DoyleProgram SpecialistRehabilitation Services AdministrationU.S. Dept. Of Education550 12th St, SW, Rm 5125Washington, DC 20202202-245-6630Jim.Doyle@ed.gov From: Thomas Hahn <firstname.lastname@example.org> Sent: Monday, May 4, 2020 12:15 PM To: Doyle, Jim <Jim.Doyle@ed.gov> Subject: Re: Message I am about giving up trying to explain because nobody wants to try to understand anyways. The problems are so much different than what people think but I cannot draw any serious attention. I have run out of energy to keep trying. My mind needs to be shut down. I am unable to continue solving problems. I do not know what else to try that I have not already tried. I am feeling so alone that I do not want to carry on anymore. On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 8:06 AM Doyle, Jim <Jim.Doyle@ed.gov> wrote:Hi Thomas, I received your voice message yesterday. I’m unable to call you, but please feel free to email me directly. It is recommended that you do not include everyone on your email since our spam protection perceives this as spam and your messages are filtered out. Thank you Jim DoyleProgram SpecialistRehabilitation Services AdministrationU.S. Dept. Of Education550 12th St, SW, Rm 5125Washington, DC 20202202-245-6630Jim.Doyle@ed.gov ================================================== The reason why I still love America is because here I can email with the government even when strongly disagreeing with it. In Germany this is impossible. =================================================== Why do we have computer viruses? Because a fired employee got upset about his employer firing him. Since mental healthcare professionals discriminated against me by making me unemployable, I have developed I virus that spams out suicide messages to make therapists unemployable. Why did Adolf Hitler start World War II? Because he got upset about not getting hired when he was young. If Adolf Hitler had been hired to draw art pictures he'd be too distracted to focus on taking over Germany. That is why nobody can be held responsible for his actions because we are all driven by external circumstances like honeybee insects. I do not expect anyone to agree with my radical opinion above (external consistency) but I would like people to understand where I am coming from (Internal consistency) if my underlying assumptions that we have no choice would hold true. ============================================================= Below is the proof that my intuition is correct despite my lack of any formal education in economics, employment and disability. But even here the government only understood half of my message. The experts seem to have failed to understand that job performance between non-disabled employees can vary by a factor higher than 10. This implies that productivity can be boosted by considering reassigning job responsibilities any time a new employee is hired or fired even if no employee is disabled. ==================================================== ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Thomas Hahn <email@example.com> Date: Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 7:47 PM Subject: Fwd: WorkforceGPS.org Comment To: easyto usa <firstname.lastname@example.org>, <email@example.com> Dear Talal and Rohit, I would like you to understand that since my intuition was correct in the past, there is at least a risk that it might be correct in the future as well. Hence, I'd like you to pay attention to my inserted response by the disability employment expert from the US Department of Labor below: ============================================================= Dear Mr. Hahn, Thank you for your recent email inquiry to the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL). Your inquiry was forwarded to the Employment and Training Administration (ETA) for response. Your paper discussing job-centered approach versus task-centered approach is fascinating. =============================================================== I am seriously worried about that if I keep failing to get the attention that I believe my ideas deserve, I may run out of suicide alternatives and kill myself prematurely. Even if nobody can understand this, let alone to agree with my view point, for me, it is my subjective mental reality within which I am trapped until I can either escape from it, or take my life, if I should subjectively feels that it is absolutely impossible to ever feel fully understood by anyone! Even David (i.e. Cc: Jones, David M - ETA <Jones.David.M@dol.gov>) and Dunhamn, Scherrone - ETA <Dunhamn.Scherrone@dol.gov>have blocked my email. Even for them, their procedures and rules are more important to them than the objective for which they were created and my life too. I have no formal training in disability employment, suicide prevention, creating undetectable economic monopolies, which are absolutely forbidden by American Anti-Trust-Laws, Education, Politics, Psychological Warfare, human behavior prediction and manipulation, National Security, etc., Nevertheless, I feel like an innate expert in those fields without having had the opportunity to ever study them in a formal academic setting. But out of all the 7 billion people with whom we share this planet, there should be at least one person for whom my life is more important than any authoritatively enforced laws because as soon as authorities have succeeded in creating the subjective misconception in my mind that my ideas are not even worse to be considered, then they will be lost forever, since this is my secret suicide trigger, which nobody has taken serious yet. If Mike had nod paid attention to my CIA secret maybe the airport supervisor in Havana would have, if the Cuban Immigration Services would have permitted him to let me stay in his house in Havana for $30/night before Mike saved my life on the same evening of 12/9/19 after Cuba made the mistake to reject my asylum application during the morning of the same day in front of the Interjet counter Otherwise, I would have shared my military secret that my ex-girlfriend was the best American soldier in shooting rockets at every Iranian tank that tried to drive south of the 32nd degree northern latitude despite the American warning to refrain from doing so. Later Cuban Immigration Service officers felt offended by my expired OPT. At the time when Mike rescued me while I had no more energy to even sit and all the cash I had was $2 and 2 Cuban Pesos, the Cuban Immigration physician argued in Spanish that I must not be permitted to sleep in Cuba trying to hide from my mom and Sharon because of the American economic sanctions against Cuba. Now I would have complained by arguing in Spanish: "Uno Momento Amigos! Alemangne!. But since this was only the second day in my entire life that I was exposed to a Spanish speaking environment, I could not defend myself by arguing my viewpoint in Spanish. But not being able to speak any Spanish less than 48 hours after I have traveled south of the American-Mexican boarder did not prevent me from understanding the arguments of my Cuban Immigration Services physician. The strange thing was that the political arm of the Cuban Immigration Services, i.e. Monica, ordered to have a bed build for me at the airport in Havana because she believed me that I really lacked the energy to sit in my chair during detainment instead of laying down on the floor begging for the doctor's permission to take my Tamazopan instead of being deported back to Cancun, where I knew nobody and believed I'd die in Cancun since nobody understood me ever since I have arrived in Cancun at 9 p.m. on 7/12/19 because I had no where else to go since my 60 day OPT grace period ended on 12/7/19. Now I noticed that I am driven to translate most of my Facebook and Twitter posts into Spanish because I have the subjective impression that America is no longer trying to understand me. I honestly only want to keep trying to stay alive if my life is more important to somebody than the rules, which were initially created to protect the lives of people rather than to raise their suicide risk higher than absolutely necessary by ignoring them long enough and refusing to meet them at an equal level until they much rather prefer to be dead instead of ignored, discredited, misunderstood, misdiagnosed, rejected, discriminated against and not taken serious in any respect. ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Dunhamn, Scherrone - ETA <Dunhamn.Scherrone@dol.gov> Date: Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 3:15 PM Subject: WorkforceGPS.org Comment To: firstname.lastname@example.org <email@example.com> Cc: Jones, David M - ETA <Jones.David.M@dol.gov> Dear Mr. Hahn, Thank you for your recent email inquiry to the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL). Your inquiry was forwarded to the Employment and Training Administration (ETA) for response. Your paper discussing job-centered approach versus task-centered approach is fascinating. The Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration is committed to providing high quality job training, employment, and labor market information and services through state and local workforce development systems. ETA assists individuals who have been dislocated from their job or are seeking better employment through the American Job Centers. The Federal government provides funding for the American Job Center to states, which set statewide policies and then distribute funds to Local Workforce Development Boards. Boards establish additional policies that guide the provision of services by the American Job Center. Therefore, we encourage you to contact your local American Job Center regarding your interest in finding employment in the Bioinformatics field. At the American Job Center in your area, you will find helpful professionals and easy to use information and resources to help guide your career development. Based on the information provided in your letter, your nearest American Job Center is most likely: Arkansas Workforce Center at Little Rock 5401 South University Ave. Little Rock, AR 72209Phone: 501-682-7719 or 1-800-250-6691 Please be sure to call in advance to make sure this address is up to date. If you want to find another American Job Center you can go online to America’s ServiceLocator at www.servicelocator.org or you can call toll-free 1-877-US-2JOBS (1-877-872-5627). If you are interested in obtaining Federal Employment, The U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) has a website for jobseekers looking for employment with the Federal Government. The website is located at: http://www.usajobs.gov/ OPM also offers a resource page for jobseekers with disabilities.https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/disability-employment/getting-a-job/ Also, each Department within the Federal Government has a Selective Placement Program Coordinator (SPPC) who assists management in recruiting, hiring and accommodating people with disabilities. Once you have determined what Department(s) in which you want to pursue employment please contact the SPPC. A link to the Directory of SPPC’s may be found at:http://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/disability-employment/selective-placement-program-coordinator-directory/ As a person who has a disability, you may also contact the Vocational Rehabilitation (VR) agency in your state. VR assists people with disabilities obtain the needed assistance in order to be employed. You may be eligible to receive employment-related services through the Office of Rehabilitation Services. To see a list of State Vocational Rehabilitation agencies, please visithttps://askjan.org/cgi-win/TypeQuery.exe?902 Lastly, we encourage you to visit www.careeronestop.org, a website sponsored by the U.S. Department of Labor offering career and job search resources as well as the latest national workforce information. The website offers many resources to job seekers and is a great tool to locate job opportunities and training. Sincerely, Scherrone N. Dunhamn, MPA(202) 693-3744__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________From: Thomas Hahn [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] Sent: Monday, November 06, 2017 2:05 PM To: Jones, David M - ETA Subject: Re: FW: FOR REVIEW: WorkforceGPS.org Comment Thank you David. My zip code is 72204. I live in Little Rock, Arkansas. Finding employment is difficult because I am only allowed to apply for bioinformatics jobs within the field of my studies but not outside the field of my studies since I am an international student on F-1 student visa seeking full time employment in the USA on OPT (optional practical training) work permit. Thanks a lot for helping me to get connected Best regards Thomas Hahn(Bioinformatics PhD candidate) Office: Engineering and Information Technology (EIT) Building, Room 535Office Phone: 501 682 1440Cell Phone: 318 243 3940 (Please try this number firstHome Phone: 501 303 6595Google Voice Phone:501 301 4890Work Email:TFHahn@UALR.eduPrivate Email:Hahn5Thomas@gmail.comSkype User Name: TFH002Twitter: @Thomas_F_Hahn On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Jones, David M - ETA <Jones.David.M@dol.gov> wrote:Mr. Hahn, I look forward to reading your written material later this week. I will follow-up if there are any questions. In the meantime, if you are seeking resources about support services to help you find employment in your local area, please advise to make sure you get that information. To provide that specialized assistance, please provide your zip code so my colleague can track neighboring service centers. David From: Thomas Hahn [mailto:email@example.com] Sent: Monday, November 06, 2017 12:20 PM To: Jones, David M - ETA Subject: Re: FW: FOR REVIEW: WorkforceGPS.org Comment Dear David, Thank you very much for your email. I have copy-pasted my writing below and in attached Word document. I am not trained in business or economics but in bioinformatics. I wrote this because I am looking for jobs because I am autistic and legally blind but cannot succeed unless my recommendations below get implement. Are my writings making sense to you? It might be easier to discuss by voice. You are welcome to call me any time. If we divide the tasks into the smallest divisible units then even people with only a few job skills could get jobs. This also helps companies to benefit from hiring specialists for a smaller group of tasks. Best regards, Thomas Hahn Office: EIT room 535Office Phone:501 682 1440Smart Phone:501 303 6595Flip Phone:318 243 3940Google Voice Phone:(501) 301-4890 Skype ID: tfh002Work Email:TFHahn@UALR.eduPrivate Email:Hahn5Thomas@gmail.com How can this newly proposed employee-centered work assignment approach and flexible job responsibilities increase productivity by hiring more disabled applicants? Title:Which changes are needed in the hiring objectives, the hiring-decision-making-process and criteria for determining the most qualified candidate so that more disabled applicants can get hired despite lacking essential job functions while improving the employer's economic and commercial productivity, profitability and competitiveness by reassigning job tasks to more suited employees; thus, reflecting the changes in their job-skill ranking? Project goal: Increase the number of disabled and handicapped lacking essential job functions to get hired by replacing the currently used job-description-based hiring criteria for making hiring decisions with new task-based employee-centered hiring criteria because they are based on the whole company's performance; thus, causing the employer's productivity, profitability and competitiveness to improve much more compared to current common hiring decision making practices. Abstract: Hiring decisions can be risky. How much can employers save by better understanding the motivations and objectives of each applicant? How much time and expertise should be invested in getting to know each applicant? Will such efforts raise the return on investment? What are the shortcomings and deficits of the criteria to evaluate, compare and rank applicants? How do they need to get changed to reflect the shift in the relative order of job skills between employees when the composition of the team (total of all employees) changes by hiring, firing or replacing? A job description combines tasks and steps to a random set of job responsibilities. But could there be better ways to bundle tasks together and to look for the most qualified applicant for this particular arbitrarily defined task bundle? Could the employer benefit from regrouping all small tasks, which a company must perform, by changing which and how many small job tasks will be bundled together in different job descriptions? And if so, how can reassigning each little tasks from different jobs to the most suitable employee (task-centered approach) instead of looking for the most qualified applicant for a particular job (job-centered approach) help in improving productivity and profitability? How and why will the new task-centered approach help to increase the workforce diversity more than the job-centered approach? How can reassigning tasks help disabled and handicapped lacking essential job functions to get hired anyways? How can employers benefit from not only looking for the most qualified applicant for any particular job (i.e. arbitrarily bundle of tasks and steps) Why does the task-centered based hiring decision benefit employees, employees, applicants and disabled job-seekers more than job-centered based hiring decisions? What are the benefits to seek the best employee for each task (task-centered) instead of the most qualified applicant for a particular job? How can employers benefit from a paradigm shift replacing the job-centered with the task-centered hiring perspective? How can the multi-dimensional effects, which different combinations of employees (i.e. teams) on the overall productivity and profitability be measured? How much welfare and unemployment benefits could be saved if employers were aware of the additional benefits when making task or employee based hiring decisions instead of exclusively looking for the most qualified applicant? How can reassigning job-tasks to different employees help applicants to become the most qualified job-seeker despite lacking essential job functions? How could employers be convinced that they'd benefit most from reassigning tasks from different jobs to the employee most qualified for a particular task instead of only looking for the best applicant for a particular job consisting of an arbitrary bundle of tasks? America is the world leader in promoting and harnessing the benefits from workforce diversification because it invests more than any other country in increasing its workforce diversity? But why are most employers still legally prohibited in applying the concepts of workforce diversification also to foreigners? Is it fair to force people to look for jobs without giving them the opportunity to contribute to redefine their job description by replacing all job tasks, which they cannot perform as well as other, with job tasks they can do better or at least as well as others? Disabled and handicapped applicants may lack essential job functions when considering all tasks in the job description as a group despite being better in a few tasks than everyone else. This means that they would be most qualified when basing this decision only on tasks, which they can do better than everyone else. This improves their integration into the workforce while at the same time increase their employer's productivity. What is the reason for this simple approach (i.e. to improve productivity by finding the best applicant to increase the new employee-team's performance given that each job responsibilities (i.e. job tasks) can change to reflect changes in the relative ranking of job skills (i.e. employee-specific tasks-specific work) performance) not having been proposed by anybody before me that I am aware off. This should be easy for business optimization people. Why does nobody seem to understand and get excited about the potential benefits of applying this task-centered approach (i.e. considering all the tasks of a company regardless of job-description and reassigning them to maximize each employee's performance whenever the composition of their employee team (i.e. by hiring, firing , replacing, training or giving access to additional resources to any of their employees) even so it offers an additional dimension of optimization (i.e. task optimization by finding the best employee when considering each task individually regardless from what job description it originated) when compared to the currently used job-description based approach to determine the most qualified job applicant? How would society as a whole benefit from here proposed improvements resulting from replacing the objective of the hiring process to no longer seek the most qualified applicant for a particular job, but instead to with the goal to search for the applicant, who - if he joins the team consisting of already hired employees - what help most in improving the team's overall performance? In many cases the most qualified applicant for a particular job can be also the one, who is the best in improving the team's overall performance. But in any case where the most qualified for a particular job is not the same person as the job-seeker, who - if hired instead - could increase his employer's competitiveness even more given the option to reassign each little task to the best employee for it instead of being limited by only looking for the best applicant for a particular job without the option to also consider applicants, who are much better than anyone else in very few tasks only, but who are excluded from consideration for any job as long as the job-description contains only one little tiny task, which he cannot perform as well as his/her competitors (employment-barrier bottleneck)? Why is it worth our efforts to invest more resources in rearranging job-tasks assignments to different employees to help in creating a new job description, for which to make disabled job seekers to be the most qualified applicant despite lacking essential job functions when being limited to considering only all job-tasks bundled together in a job-description? This is the form of integration to reduce the impacts of shortcomings resulting from unemployment and being excluded from all the benefits to belong to their employer's organization. Moreover, it’s a missed change for considering all little job tasks together as a whole and by reassigning them individually to the employee, who can do it best; hence maximizing the overall employee-composed team's productivity (task-centered approach) instead of unnecessarily being limited to finding only the best job candidate when being restricted by considering all job tasks, which have been grouped together to form a job description (job-centered approach) because this prevents employers from benefiting from the amazing gifts and talents many job seekers lacking essential job functions had to offer if their employer would allow them to rewrite their job description but replacing all job tasks they'd perform poorly with job tasks they can perform better than others. Since a job consists of a list of tasks and a task is a smaller indivisible unit than a job looking for the best employee for each individual task provides more flexibility than when unnecessarily limiting oneself by considering all tasks belonging to a particular job as an indivisible atomic unit. Since replacing the job-centered with the task-centered hiring approach would allow many disabled to find jobs while improving their employer's productivity, it should be promoted and required. But why then I have never seen it used anywhere? In the attached file and below the following questions/items will be discussed: 1.) Objective, Motivation and Background of this writing2.) Circumstances of my here described economic discoveries, which I made at SAP in NewTown Squared, PA, around noon on Friday, July 14th, 20173.) Can I request - as a disability job accommodation for my legal blindness - to have all my job tasks, which I cannot do well, replaced by others at which I am better?4.) Which are the best methods for determining the most qualified applicant and which criteria should be used to evaluate, compare and rank their job performance?5.) How should the objectives of the hiring-decision-making process be changed?6.) What are the new job performance evaluation criteria?7.) Does faster necessarily mean better?8.) Why should we replace our single job-performance-centered concept with an overall company-performance-centered team concept?9.) How should the current job-centered approach be replaced by the better more profitable task-centered approach?10.) What does it mean for me personally and how does it impact my chances for finding a paid fulltime job?11.) Can everything be boiled down to an optimization problem?12.) Do disability-induced shortcomings tend to invoke superior coping skills?13.) Why does nobody object to the current policy to limit diversity only to citizens?14.) Is there hope for jobs if not too farfetched for immigration laws to follow my logic?15.) Will machine learners be given as much freedom for job options as statisticians? Please send your thoughts, suggestions, solutions, ideas, opinions, advice, recommendations, useful links, contacts, connections, resources, offers to help and advice directly to the author, i.e. Thomas Hahn, because his text-to-speech software, which he must use because he is legally blind, cannot read from this interface properly. Please feel free to contact Thomas Hahn by any of the communication options below: Office Phone: 501 682 1440Smart Phone: 501 303 6595Flip Phone: 318 243 3940 (Please try this number first to locate me)Google Voice Phone: (501) 301-4890 Skype ID: tfh002Work Email: TFHahn@UALR.eduPrivate Email: Hahn5Thomas@gmail.com Audience? Why do I deserve help in getting hired for as a bioinformatics post-doc or at SAP - despite looking less qualified - based on currently unfortunately still unchallenged, but nevertheless suboptimal performing, and therefore, hopefully soon outdated criteria for making hiring decisions, provided that hiring managers, business-leaders, immigration officers, labor-experts, unions, rehab counselors, their supervisors, regional managers, politicians and President Donald Trump would take the time to read this writing to its very end and try very hard to understand its simplified take-home message? Objective, Motivation and Background of this writing: I feel anxious about the urgent need to convince powerful decision-makers from requiring correcting the common flaws, which I discovered to underlie the current hiring-decision-making process, before any hiring manager can be convinced from benefiting to hire me despite the shortcomings caused by my disabilities preventing me from completing most job tasks as fast as others. Circumstances of my here described economic discoveries, which I made at SAP in NewTown Squared, PA, around noon on Friday, July 14th, 2017 On the one hand, I felt ecstatic because the preceding 6 weeks at SAP had given me the long overdue very much necessary proof-of-principle experience for honestly believing that - theoretically - even big highly competitive and successful for-profit companies, like SAP, Google, Microsoft IBM, SuperCar or Apple, could benefit from hiring me as long as they replaced all my job responsibilities, which consist of tasks and steps I can never do as fast as the rest, e.g. reading and searching visually, only with the few tasks I can do better than anyone else, e.g. typing and developing strategic plans indirectly circumventing barriers preventing companies from accomplishing their business objectives. I discovered the remedies needed for removing the obstacles, which have prevented anyone from hiring me fulltime long-term. I remember frantically trying to find anyone before our final presentation in the big fancy SAP auditorium I could convince from the necessity to take time to understand because it was our very last day. This writing turned into an explanation of the necessity for deserving help in convincing somebody to hire me as bioinformatics post-doc before my Optional Practical Training (OPT) work permit expires after only 3 months. I initially responded to a Facebook reply when I gradually realized the urgent need for affirmative action, i.e. an approving affirmative response, answering the central question: Can I request - as a disability job accommodation for my legal blindness - to have all my job tasks, which I cannot do well, replaced by others at which I am better? Hypothesis: If the job-description-based approach would be replaced by the job task reassigning approach more disabled and handicapped could get hired while improving productivity, profitability and competitiveness because one is not limited to consider the tasks listed in the job description as a single indivisible atomic unit. Which are the best methods for determining the most qualified applicant and which criteria should be used to evaluate, compare and rank their job performance? The main problem, which prevents me from getting hired, is that hiring decisions are based on finding the best applicant, who can finish the assigned task bundle fastest by considering all the tasks and steps belonging to his/her job responsibilities as a single atomic, indivisible unit - whereas a mutually much more beneficial way would be - to find the fastest employee for each little task regardless from which job it originated. Therefore, no job description should ever be considered as final or set in stone - but instead - it should remain flexible by dynamically reflecting any changes in the ranking order of employee-specific differences in completing the same task by conceptualizing all employees as team members desiring to win as a team by maximizing their company's overall productivity instead of being quickest and best in completing only the tasks, which were arbitrarily assigned to their job responsibilities when they were hired. How should the objectives of the hiring-decision-making process be changed? The goal of the hiring-decision-making process must be changed to seek the most promising candidate for raising the overall company productivity even if he/she could not compete with the most qualified job-seeker, who has proven to be faster in completing all the tasks / steps of the job sequentially. What are the new job performance evaluation criteria? Hence, instead of evaluating only one applicant at a time in isolation, his/her expected beneficial impact on the overall company performance, i.e. maximizing its productivity and profit, must be ranked to determine the applicant, who gets the job offer if he/she is less qualified by direct performance comparison between job-seekers. Does faster necessarily mean better? Using this new much better criterion for making hiring decisions might result in the job not being offered to the fastest applicant, who was the best in completing all tasks / steps of his job fastest in sequential order, but to a slower competitor - who, despite looking less qualified for the job - appears to have a skill set, which seems better suited for reassigning the company's tasks to different workers in such a way that improves the overall company productivity more than if the faster, i.e. more qualified looking applicant, would have joined the already existing team. Why should we replace our single job-performance-centered concept with an overall company-performance-centered team concept? In order to maximize productivity and profit the hiring manager should conceptualize the resulting group of employees as a single functional unit, i.e. like co-expressed genes forming a single functional unit, or like a winning Olympic sports team consisting only of highly collaborative members, who are putting their team's, i.e. their company's interests over their own by first worrying maximizing their company's productivity and profit before thinking about raising their paycheck. Ideally, the employees' behavior and priorities follow the rationale that - if everyone devotes everything he/she can towards maximizing their company's profit first - then there is a better chance for everyone to get a higher raise by their employer than when insisting that the pay-raises reflect the difference in job performance between each worker. How should the current job-centered approach be replaced by the better more profitable task-centered approach? For any job duty requiring reading I am too slow. But if my job duties would only be typing, then I'd be faster than most people. Therefore, I want my employer to give all my reading tasks to somebody else and give me their writing tasks instead. I want to convince employers that it is better for them to find the best and fastest employee for each task, i.e. to consider each task separately even when they are part of different job-descriptions(task-centered approach), instead of looking only for the job-candidate, who can perform all job duties when considered as a group faster than his competitors(job-centered approach). This could save lots of money for the company because if a new person gets hired and he/she is better or faster at a certain task than all the others, then the boss moves this task to him/her. This means that nobody's job descriptions stay the same, but instead, get changed because the manager should start optimizing the overall employee performance by trying to find the best and fasted employee for each little task even if he needs to assign unrelated tasks from different job description to the same employee as a result of optimization. On the other hand, tasks from the same job may be completed by different employees to maximize their combined strengths while minimizing their combined weaknesses. What does it mean for me personally and how does it impact my chances for finding a paid fulltime job? Some tasks are harder than others and certain employees may have disabilities that prevent them from performing some tasks altogether. For example, I could never drive even if my job requires it. In this case I'd feel bad if not being able to drive is the reason for not getting the job. I'd request as an accommodation to take all driving tasks out of my job responsibilities and give me typing tasks instead. This would mean that my co-worker will lose his typing tasks to me and gets my driving tasks added to his job responsibilities (especially since I can type faster than he can). Every day each company must complete certain tasks. I demand that I can pick out of these total task pool only those that I can do as well as others or even better and that all the tasks, which I could never do well, such as driving and reading, be given to my coworkers. Although I can still read with magnifiers I can only read with 1/10th of the regular reading speed, i.e. I can only read as fast as a second-grader. So if I get paid for performing reading tasks, it costs 10 times more. But assuming I can blind-type twice as fast as my coworker, who had the typing in his job description before I was hired, the company would save half of its spending expenses. I just want people to understand that job descriptions should never be considered as being set in stone - but instead - they are dynamically changing because they depend on, who - of my workers - can do which tasks best. And the job description may change each time when a new worker gets hired or fired if this affects the task performance ranking between the members of my new group of employees. Only in this way visually impaired people can get a job because - let’s say I can type twice as fast as anyone else - but I can only read 10 times slower than anyone else and the job description of the job, for which I am interviewing, requires the same amount of reading and writing tasks, then overall, I'd still be 5 times slower than everyone else. But this would limit the hiring decision-making process by considering all the tasks of a job description as indivisible atomic unit. Therefore, only the applicant, who is the fastest in completing all job tasks in sequence, will get a job offer. But if my reading tasks were transferred to my co-worker and replaced by his/her writing tasks instead, I can suddenly save money for the company, because - in the same time - I can type twice as much. Does this make sense? At job interviews my slow reading speed was the reason why I did not get hired. I did not know how I could convince my would-be bosses that - if they replaced all tasks at which the shortcomings of my disabilities slow me down (e.g. reading, driving) by the few tasks, which I can complete faster than my coworkers (i.e. typing), both - the company and me - would benefit a lot. Or I have to be allowed to work in a team - like at SAP with PJ - where it was understood that I can delegate my reading tasks to my team members and compensate by doing their writing parts instead? Does this make sense? If only a single employer could understand that we'd both benefit a lot from a more flexible employee-centered skill- and performance ranking team approach, then I could escape deportation by getting hired before I would lose my OPT work permit after only 3 months. During the 6 weeks I was fortunate to be part of the Enterprise Readiness Academy at SAP's Autism at Work program this summer, I made the experiences that there a few tasks, which I can do better and faster than the rest, while being slower at most other tasks. I tried to convince my supervisors to be allowed to refuse tasks, which others can do faster, and pick from all SAP tasks only those, at which I am the fastest - even if they were not initially part of my job description - and bundle them up into a new job description designed to accommodate my disabilities while simultaneously benefiting my employer. A good side effect of this approach is that I can suddenly become the most qualified applicant despite competing against much better adapted phenotypes. This would save SAP money and allow me to escape from the prison of unemployment and fate of deportation. I'll email this to my SAP supervisor because this is the very first time I am trying to explain in writing why each little task, which can taken from different jobs, must be assigned to the fastest employee (i.e. new employee-focused approach), because - instead of keeping looking for the fastest to complete all tasks / steps, which have been arbitrarily grouped together into a single job (i.e. the old job-focused approach) - this speeds up most the overall team of employees. In the past hiring managers failed to aim at maximizing the overall team performance because they inadvertently made the mistake of seeking the best applicant for their job, which consisted of tasks / steps, because they don't seem to be aware that the best way of improving the company's ability to deal most effectively with the entire set of little tiny tasks and steps, which the company must complete single every day, and that were arbitrarily grouped together into different jobs, is to search for the best employee considering each tiny little task independently regardless to which job it initially belonged. Can everything be boiled down to an optimization problem? This transforms the hiring decision-making process into an optimization problem by altering the composition of team members in a way that allows each of them to only focus on his/her strengths without being limited by his/her weaknesses. This applies regardless whether the team includes disabled members because the range of difference in job performance, especially in coding, between non-handicapped people is much larger than the range of performance differences between disabled and non-handicapped workers. Do disability-induced shortcomings tend to invoke superior coping skills? But since handicaps tend to interfere with the normal way of doing things they increase the chances for developing compensatory copying mechanisms. For example, because I am legally blind, I cannot read my handwriting. Since my only other option to take class notes was typing I have much more typing practice allowing me now to type at least twice as fast as my peers. This is why enhancing workforce diversity benefits the whole team because - unlike in metabolic pathways - the fastest - instead of the slowest team member - is setting the speed. Therefore, even if my low vision causes me to be too slow to get hired for 99% of the tasks, this one percent of the tasks, which I can do better and faster using alternative coping methods, i.e. being forced to be the only high school student to type instead of write his class notes, allows me now to type about half as fast as people speak, i.e. which is at least twice as fast as the average non-handicapped person. Hence, hiring managers should try to hire the applicant, who - by joining an already existing team - allows to reassign the each tiny task to the most qualified employee; thus, maximizing the total overall company productivity. Why does nobody object to the current policy to limit diversity only to citizens? But despite this powerful and absolutely true personal example of the powerful way, by which workforce diversification and inclusion benefit the overall team performance, nobody seems to be bothered about its application to remain limited to the lucky 5% of the world's population, who were fortunate to be labeled American citizens or permanent residents. Unfortunately, nobody seems to worry about the loss of potential contribution of remaining 95% of the world's population to diversity because they are not allowed to join the workforce. America is the country with the strongest commitment to diversify its workforce. But why then is the federal government making it so unnecessary hard for foreign handicapped university graduates to join the workforce after having already invested a lot in training them to become gainfully employed after graduation? If the legislators and political decision-makers could only understand the concept of my writings we could easily double our productivity. But instead, I am forbidden to work most of the jobs I could realistically get. How can I convince bioinformatics employers from the overall benefit to hire me? How can I convince the people in charge of deciding, whom to offer a post-doc position, that the loss in diversity will be much bigger when everyone keeps ranking the applicants by their publication records; thus, placing me always last. Nobody seems to be aware that the loss in diversity of bioinformatics methods is much bigger if nobody hires me because this will force me to leave America for good after being giving only 3 months to hunt for jobs for which my disabilities make me look less qualified than other applicants with the same degree. Then everything I have developed throughout my post secondary education to remain in good academic standing despite being legally blind will get lost because without a job to apply my alternative ways of coping with the limitations of vision loss I will forget them. Hence, only a few years of inactivity would create exactly same situation as I'd be in, if I were never given the opportunity to come to America and benefit a lot of the empowering concept of workforce diversification according to which being disabled is not a necessarily always a bad thing. I am certain that analogously to my example how my low vision doubled my typing speed by slowing down my reading, I can find also niches in bioinformatics given enough time to figure out by trial and error what works and what does not. This is actually the basis on which my PI has been working with me. He never punished me if I could not figure out a way to complete his assignment - but instead - he gave me new ones, until only by trial and error, I was able to complete enough work for graduating. I am worried that I cannot find post-doc supervisors, who are as understanding as my current PI, because before I got him I had others, who insisted that I'll complete all tasks only own my own. Unlike my current PI, who emails me the articles, which he wants me to read, the previous one felt, that anyone, who is struggling with finding relevant papers, cannot complete the PhD requirements. I am writing all this because I feel it’s my only chance to convince at least a single supervisor to hire me. The biggest hurdle will be to find somebody, who thinks it is worth his/her time to read until the end and really tries to understand and help. If anyone, who is reading this, can think of any PI, who could potentially be convinced by this writing from overall benefit of hiring me for mankind as a whole, of which every single human is a team member regardless of citizenship, please forward this to him/her or email me his contact information toHahn5Thomas@gmail.com Please communicate any suggestions for modification of content, length, media and tone by any of the communication channels to get in touch with me, which I have listed at the very end of this email under my name. Is there hope for jobs if not too farfetched for immigration laws to follow my logic? As I discovered at SAP, many problems, regardless whether it’s in bioinformatics, genomics, biology, medicine, supplies, cars, or return on investments, can be boiled down to optimization problems, whose optimal solution can be best approximated by comparing different machine learning algorithms and optimizing their parameters. For my dissertation I optimized machine learning algorithms' parameters to minimize the error of my yeast age predictor, whereas SAP is optimizing the parameters of its machine learning algorithms to minimize the differences between predicted and actually earned profits. Will machine learners be given as much freedom for job options as statisticians? Statisticians on OPT work permit are lucky because they can apply their statistics in almost any field, but bioinformatics jobs must at least have some biology and some computing component because it’s about discovering computational solutions for biological problems, except - maybe - for text-mining. But what about machine learning? If it can be used to find the optimal solution for complex problems in any area of specialization, then it can - like statistics - be applied to anything. Consequently, foreign machine learners - like statisticians - should be allowed to accept a wide range of jobs while on OPT because they can apply what they have learnt in school to almost any field of study. So should I try to increase my job options by claiming to be a machine learner, who applies machine learning to maximize Primerica's profits, because that was the only company that offered me a job at the UALR job fair? But unfortunately, I already declined their job offer because I could not think of a way to argue that optimizing profits earned from selling life insurances policies is related to bioinformatics by any stretch of imagination. Thanks a lot in advance for trying to understand. Thomas Hahn(unsuccessful bioinformatics post-doc applicant) Office: EIT room 535Office Phone:501 682 1440Smart Phone:501 303 6595Flip Phone:318 243 3940Google Voice Phone:(501) 301-4890 Skype ID: tfh002Work Email:TFHahn@UALR.eduPrivate Email:Hahn5Thomas@gmail.com On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Jones, David M - ETA <Jones.David.M@dol.gov> wrote:Good Afternoon Mr. Hahn, My name is David Jones and I work within the Employment and Training Administration (ETA) within the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL). I understand you transmitted an email to ETA WorkforceGPS regarding your interest in sharing ideas with DOL regarding hiring disability population in labor force and how productivity can be increased. You may forward your ideas to me and look forward to reading them. My areas of focus within DOL is in the matter you described in your communication. Again, I look forward to reading your comments.